It
seemed to me that the better you were in a subject at Castle Rock the
more your education was going to suffer. In part one I described how in
the first year how I spent vast amounts of time doing “trivial and
remedial tasks that would have barely stretched my mind at the age of 6
or 7 let alone 11” At primaryschool I was well known for one thing,
being good at maths. I was top of the class from almost the start. This
was recognised by every teacher without exception, as a result I was
allowed to learn at my own pace ahead of most of the class. Sometimes I
would be over a year in front.
The
first few weeks at Castle Rock in maths was like being put back with
the 6 year olds. All we did was adding, multiplying, subtracting and
dividing 2 digit numbers. At the time I wasn’t too worried as Maths was
about the only subject that we were going to be tested on and then split
into groups according to ability. We sat the tests and I easily ended
up in the top set.
Even
after this things didn’t get any better, we were still doing the stuff I
had already proved myself competent at and been tested on 3-4 years
earlier. Magic squares, pythagoras theorem, area, the list just went on
and on. I remember being given the textbook and having a look through
and finding nothing that I hadn’t done before. Needless to say my
interest in the subject dropped very quickly. If I had spent just one
hour in the final year at primary school doing any of this work I would
have got in trouble for doing work that was not challenging enough. Now I
was not only wasting months of classroom time but I was also expected
to be doing homework as well.
A
lot of the time I often didn’t bother doing my homework, I just didn’t
see why I should waste even more time (more details on the later dated
entry HOMEWORK). I told my parents what was going on and they were not
happy. After a few months came the first parents evening, prior to them
going I was promised that they would be having serious words with the
teacher Mrs Gimson. They even talked about pulling me out of Maths if
something wasn’t done about it.
On
returning from parents evening what happened was the exact opposite,
when my parents found out I wasn’t doing my homework they instantly took
her side. We had a massive argument about it. They argued that I had to
do the work I was given and prove to them that I was good then I would
be able to learn ahead of the others as before. I argued that I had
already proved what I could do at primary school, and even tried to get
them to get my old Maths books out of the attic which they didn’t. I
have always been disgusted with my parents for not taking my side as my
education would have turned out very different.
In
the end everything I said was right, nobody who was good at maths was
ever allowed to learn ahead of everyone else. It was a one size fit all
mentality from start to finish, a year later age 12 I was still doing
fractions which I first did aged 9. In the 3 years the only things I
learned were the basics of algebra and trigonometry. I estimate that
around 80-90 percent of the time I spent in Maths (around 10 percent of
my total education time at Castle rock) was a complete and total waste
of time.
It
wasn’t until I reached the next school (King Edward VII) that the maths
curriculum finally caught up with my level but by then the damage had
been done. At primary school I had always been given the push that I
needed, at Castle rock I spent 3 years disinterested and not bothered.
At the following school it was difficult to regenerate the interest and
enthusiasm I had previously. By the time I was 15-16 years old I started
to struggle at the very subject I was once well known for being the
best at.
The
natural ability was still there and I did pass my G.C.S.E (grade B) and
later A-level (grade E) but as far as i’m concerned I massively
underachieved.
I don’t think there's a better example of how Castle Rock high school destroyed my education.
I think after all that it was rather ironic that my school reports contained statements like “capable of higher standards”
MATHS REPORTS (all Mrs Gimson)
1988 - DECEMBER - An able pupil but Matthew needs to put more care and effort into his work. He is capable of higher standards.
1989
- MAY - Matthew must appreciate the need to produce consistently good
results not just rely on test situations. This work if often carelessly
done does show that he understands the concepts. He is not doing justice
to his ability, more attention to homework needed too.
1990
- FEBRUARY - A logical thinker who needs to work on expressing his
ideas verbally and in written form. He grasps new ideas quickly but
tends to be careless in executing them. He has displayed more interest
and commitment this year.
1990
- NOVEMBER - Matthew still plays scant attention to the presentation of
his written work. He must recognise the importance of displaying his
knowledge and ability to apply concepts. Which he undoubtedly has.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment